#Nevada board of medicine lynnette daniels email license#

12ДЄccording to Chancellor, the pattern of conduct began when the Board's general counsel insisted that Chancellor's license be revoked rather than merely suspended.

#Nevada board of medicine lynnette daniels email full#

10Д¬hancellor claims that he completed the rehabilitation program in August 1999 and the diversion program in mid-2007, 11 but that the Board breached its obligations under the stipulation and, from 1999 to 2014, actively interfered with his ability to regain a full and unrestricted medical license. 9 According to Chancellor, the stipulation prohibited the Board from using the medical-malpractice charges against him or to comment to others about them. 8 In exchange for Chancellor acknowledging that he was guilty of substance abuse, entering a three-month rehabilitation program, and successfully completing the Board's diversion program, the Board allegedly dismissed the three counts of medical malpractice. 7 Nearly a year later, Chancellor stipulated to the substance-abuse charge, and the Board revoked his medical license. In the spring of 1998, the Board charged Chancellor with substance abuse and three counts of medical malpractice. And because Chancellor has not demonstrated-and I do not find-that the interests of economy, convenience, fairness, or comity would be served if I retained jurisdiction over Chancellor's remaining, state-law claims, I decline to retain supplemental jurisdiction over them, dismiss those claims without prejudice, and instruct the Clerk of Court to close this case. I therefore grant the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings as to Chancellor's federal RICO claim. I find that it is plain on the face of Chancellor's first amended complaint that his federal RICO claim is time barred and that he has not alleged any facts that would allow me to toll the statute of limitations governing that claim. 4 Chancellor responds that dismissal on statute-of-limitations grounds is proper only if the liberally read allegations in the complaint would not permit him to prove that the statute could be tolled, 5 and that I have discretion to retain supplemental jurisdiction over his state-law claims even if I dispose of his federal RICO claim.

Defendants argue that, upon adjudicating that claim against Chancellor, I should also decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Chancellor's remaining state-law claims. 3 The defendants now move for judgment on the pleadings, arguing, among other things, that Chancellor's federal RICO claim, which is the sole basis for federal subject-matter jurisdiction in this non-diverse case, is time barred. Robert Chancellor sues several current and former members and employees and the general counsel of the Nevada Board of Medical Examiners (the Board) under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) act, 1 Nevada's civil RICO statute, 2 and also for fraud, breach of contract, defamation, abuse of process, and negligence. Order Granting in Part Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Dismissing Remaining State-law Claims, and Closing Case Дr. Sullivan, Robison Belaustegui Sharp & Low. Breslow, Robison Belaustegui Sharp & Low & Michael E. Richard Legarza, Defendant, represented by Barry L. Lanette Daniels, Defendant, represented by Barry L. Louis Ling, Defendant, represented by Barry L. Sullivan, Robison Belaustegui Sharp & Low.Дrennan Clark, Defendant, represented by Barry L.

Joel Lubritz, Defendant, represented by Barry L. Lessly, Defendant, represented by Barry L. Robert Chancellor, M.D., Plaintiff, represented by E.